• News
  • Lifestyle
    • Recipes
    • Video
    • Lotto Results
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Travel
  • Sport
  • Expat Life
  • Move to Australia
Sunday, January 24, 2021
Australian Times News
  • News
  • Lifestyle
    • Recipes
    • Video
    • Lotto Results
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Travel
  • Sport
  • Expat Life
  • Move to Australia
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Lifestyle
    • Recipes
    • Video
    • Lotto Results
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Travel
  • Sport
  • Expat Life
  • Move to Australia
No Result
View All Result
Australian Times News
No Result
View All Result
Home News

PETER GRESTE: To protect press freedom, we need more public outrage – and an overhaul of our laws

OPINION & ANALYSIS: The police raids on the ABC and a News Corp journalist have forced us to think again about the role of the media in a democracy.

The Conversation by The Conversation
10-06-2019 10:23
in News
Photo: David Gray/AAP/The Conversation

Photo: David Gray/AAP/The Conversation

A few days ago, Waleed Aly asked a not-so-rhetorical question in The Sydney Morning Herald. He wondered how many Australians were worried about the fact that the Australian Federal Police had spent a good portion of this week raiding the offices and homes of journalists who’ve published stories clearly in the public interest.

His conclusion? Not many. He went on to argue that it is because we have developed a culture of accepting excessive state power, with no real thought about the consequences for civil liberties or the functioning of our democracy.

Sadly, I would have to agree with Aly, but as with so many surveys, the answer you get depends on the question you ask.

What if we asked, “Hands up who feels comfortable with relying on the Facebook posts and Twitter feeds of our politicians and departmental spokespeople for information about what our government is up to? Who thinks that is a good way to run a democracy?” Then, I bet you’d get a very different answer.


Read more: Why the raids on Australian media present a clear threat to democracy


I agree that Australian media are hardly trusted by the public, but I am also convinced that most Australians recognise the need for some kind of independent watchdog keeping track of politicians and the government on our behalf. It might be imperfect and messy, but a free press has performed that role well enough to keep us broadly on track for much of our history.

Earlier this week, my colleague and fellow University of Queensland researcher Rebecca Ananian-Welsh laid out the intricate web of national security laws passed in recent years that collectively serve to straight-jacket journalists and threaten legitimate whistle-blowing.

AlsoRead...

Environmental impact

Pollinators: neonicotinoid pesticides stop bees and flies from getting a good night’s sleep

24 January 2021
Players risk losing fitness

Self-entitled prima donnas or do they have a point? Why Australian Open tennis players find hard lockdown so tough

24 January 2021

In a number of research projects, we have been looking at both these laws and their impact on reporting, and while we still have a long way to go, the early results suggest something deeply troubling.

While they may have helped shore up national security, the laws have also led to a net loss of transparency and accountability. It has become harder for journalists to reach and protect sources and keep track of wrong-doing by government officials. It has also become harder for them to safely publish in the public interest without risking long years in prison or cripplingly expensive and traumatic court cases.

An overhaul of Australia’s legal landscape

My organisation, the Alliance for Journalists Freedom, has published a white paper that offers a better way of balancing those two crucial elements of our democracy – national security and press freedom.

The most important of its seven recommendations is a Media Freedom Act. Australia has no legal or constitutional protection for press freedom. It isn’t even formally recognised in law; the High Court has merely inferred that we have a right to “political communication.”

That needs to change. The AJF is proposing a law that would write press freedom into the DNA of our legal system. It would both prevent our legislators from unnecessarily restricting journalists from doing their jobs and give judges a benchmark they can use whenever they are adjudicating cases that deal with media freedom issues.

That alone isn’t enough though. The second recommendation in the white paper calls for changes to the national security laws themselves.

Currently, many of the current laws that Ananian-Welsh laid out in her article include a “public interest” defence for journalists. But as we have seen in this week’s raids, that does nothing to stop the AFP from trawling through journalists’ documents for sources and forcing everyone into court.

Instead, there should be an exemption for journalists and their sources when reporting on matters of public interest.

That isn’t to suggest that journalists should be immune, though. Rather, the onus should be shifted to the authorities to show why the public interest defence should not apply. It is also important that the exemption include whistleblowers.

Beyond national security, there are a host of other laws that have contributed to a wide culture of secrecy at odds with the principles of open government.

Payouts under defamation laws now routinely run to millions, potentially destroying news organisations and chilling further investigative work. Shield laws that allow journalists to protect their sources in court are also inconsistent across states and need to be strengthened.

Suppression orders that judges use to smother reporting of certain court cases are being applied with alarming frequency and urgently need review. And whistleblower legislation needs to be strengthened to encourage and protect anybody speaking out about wrongdoing in government or elsewhere.

While the raids of the past week have been shocking, they have forced us all to think again about the role of the media in a democracy. If it leads to better legislation that both protects national security and media freedom, then some good might have come out of it after all.

___________________________________________

By Peter Greste, Professor of Journalism and Communications, The University of Queensland

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Tags: Australian politicsmediaPeter Grestepolitics
DMCA.com Protection Status

SUBSCRIBE to our NEWSLETTER

Terms and Conditions

CURRENCY ZONE

Australian Forex

Don't Miss

Pollinators: neonicotinoid pesticides stop bees and flies from getting a good night’s sleep

by The Conversation
24 January 2021
Environmental impact
News

Neonicotinoids, the most commonly used pesticides in the world, were banned in the EU in 2018. More than 99,000 people...

Read more

Self-entitled prima donnas or do they have a point? Why Australian Open tennis players find hard lockdown so tough

by The Conversation
24 January 2021
Players risk losing fitness
News

The challenge of bringing the world’s best tennis players and support staff, about 1,200 people in all, from COVID-ravaged parts...

Read more

Why the COVID-19 variants are so dangerous and how to stop them spreading

by The Conversation
24 January 2021
COVID-19 variants
News

Changes in the genetic code of viruses like COVID-19 occur all the time but most of these mutations don’t have...

Read more

Gulf blockade: Qatar hugs and makes up with its warring neighbours – but will it last?

by The Conversation
24 January 2021
Gulf blockade
News

Qatar may be the smallest of the Gulf states – but it’s the richest. So when, hours after the agreement,...

Read more

Davos 2021: to achieve a ‘great reset’, we can’t count on the same old globalists to lead the way

by The Conversation
23 January 2021
The great reset
News

The 51st World Economic Forum starts on January 25, but with a major difference. Whereas this is famously the annual...

Read more

Gene-edited crops are now a reality – but will the public be on board?

by The Conversation
23 January 2021
Gene-edited crops
News

Whereas GM crops typically contain the DNA of two different species, gene editing is more precise and allows scientists to...

Read more

Lotto Results for Saturday, 23 January 2021

by Sonja Baartman
23 January 2021
Lottery Results Lotto Numbers UK
UK Lotto

Are you ready for the National Lottery Lotto draw? Let's find out if you're an overnight millionaire

Read more
Load More

Copyright © Blue Sky Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
australiantimes.co.uk is a division of Blue Sky Publications Ltd. Reproduction without permission prohibited. DMCA.com Protection Status

  • About us
  • Write for Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact us
  • T&Cs, Privacy and GDPR
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Lifestyle
    • Recipes
    • Video
    • Lotto Results
    • Technology
  • Entertainment
  • Travel
  • Sport
  • Expat Life
  • Move to Australia

Copyright © Blue Sky Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
australiantimes.co.uk is a division of Blue Sky Publications Ltd. Reproduction without permission prohibited. DMCA.com Protection Status