Categories: Sport

WORLD CUP: France vs Australia VAR penalty – should it have been given?

For the first time in history, a penalty has been awarded through the use of VAR – or “Video Assistant Referee” – at the World Cup. Needless to say, it’s divided opinion worldwide, as well as broke the hearts of Socceroos fans.

France’s Antoine Griezmann was man adjudged to have been fouled by a desperate Aussie defender after a video review when the referee on the pitch didn’t spot the indiscretion.

France benefit from VAR

Josh Ridson made a sliding tackle that faintly clipped the back of the striker’s ankles who fell to the ground. After initially waving away Griezmann’s appeals the referee was told by the VAR officials to review the incident, which he did on a TV specially set up on the sideline for the purpose, and ultimately he overturned his decision.

Griezmann then stepped up to convert the penalty, making history in the process. It’s the first time video technology has a had a direct impact on a goal at the World Cup finals.

But was it the right call? Some remain unconvinced:

 

Others, however, feel that the right decision was made:

 

Australia then went on to equalize with a penalty of their own just moments later, after a clear handball from Samuel Umitti. This was a lot less controversial, and Australia were able to draw level almost instantly.

However, Paul Pogba’s deft chip late in the game saw France home to a 2-1 win.

TOP IMAGE: The World Cup VAR control room (BigSportGB/Twitter)

Tom Head

Writer of political and lifestyle content. Background in sports writing and local British news. Journalism graduate from the University of Leeds. Nottingham Forest fan.